no one single event or quote makes one insane.....thus the numerous examples ive given, most of which you cannot refute
You have merely mimicked the technique of LaRouche's many political enemies of patching together a bunch of out of context quotes. In fact, I bet you merely cut and pasted that stuff from a web site devoted to such a thing. You want to give the impression that you have the inside scoop on him. The fact is, Lyndon LaRouche is probably considered the most dangerous man in the world right now by certain folks in London and elsewhere, who are running a bit scared right now.
yeah, i think hes considered very credible in most circles now.
That's true. His ideas are widely discussed in political and intellectual circles around the world. Only within the Anglo-American system is it forbidden to disuss LaRouche's ideas.
by "white house" i mean to say that larouche implied there were members of our government behind the attacks.
Yes, the government is a very large institution. Your imbecilic statement that the White House was behind the attack on itself was indicative of your ignorance of what constitutes the government.
dont have to be in a "rush to ridicule" larouche....the majority of what ive done is simply provide quotes (some of which were provided on a past thread), that you cannot refute or defend.
Merely quoting someone doesn't prove or disprove anything. However, I have demonstrated that YOU don't have a clue what YOU are talking about.
by telling me the result of the enron scandal humiliated me personally, you included me and my "microscopic world".....i merely showed the foolishness behind your nonsensical comment.
It is not nonsensical at all. Over the course of our debates you consistently spew the typical line expoused by the mainstream media. They are your source for what you consider to be realiable information. They are always wrong. Enron is just the most classic example. On the other hand you ridicule anyone who is outside of the officially accepted channels of information. I merely used Enron as an example of how badly you were lied to by the media and how LaRouche and other taboo thinkers were right after all. That's when you took flight from reality, as is your habit, and tried to discredit LaRouche, instead of admitting that Wall Street and the media were accomplices in perpetuating Enron's fraud on the public, as if that would change the facts that the system is collapsing. The bottom line is, and the only reason I am even discussing this with you, is because your world is ending. The Anglo-American system is coming down. That's what's happening. That has some bit of relevance to what Jehovah's word has to say. You continue to hysterically deny the facts even as they unfold, which I find to be a very fascinating phenomenon in itself. / You Know